Analisi Putusan Mahkamah Kontitusi Tentang Batas Minimum Usia Capres Dan Cawapres Perspektif Maqashid Syariah
Keywords:
Constitutional Court, Age of Presidential and Vice Presidential Candidates, Maqashid SyariahAbstract
The Constitutional Court (MK) is an institution whose function is to oversee the constitution and the running of democracy. One of the MK's authorities is to review the constitutionality of a law against the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. Recently the MK issued a decision that shocked the wider public, namely changing the provisions regarding the minimum age limit for presidential/vice presidential candidates in Indonesia. This decision has implications for the emergence of unrest in society. This research aims to analyze the Constitutional Court's decision from the perspective of maqashid sharia. This research is library research with a qualitative approach where data collection is carried out through library searches and the collected data is analyzed using qualitative data analysis techniques. The research results found that the Constitutional Court was related to the birth of MK decision no. 90/PUU-XXI/2023 which changes the sound of Article 169 letter (q) which previously read, "at least 40 (forty) years of age" to read, "at least 40 (forty) years of age or has/is currently holding office selected through general elections" as a reinterpretation of this Article in the implementation of the judicial review, has acted beyond the limits of its authority because the Constitutional Court's task is only to assess whether a norm is constitutional or not, while the authority to add norms is the authority of the legislative institution. This decision is not in line with the concept of maqashid sharia, where the implications of the birth of this decision are proven to be unable to give birth to mashlahah for Indonesian society at large, on the contrary, it actually causes quite a lot of harm, especially in the aspect of maintaining the values of justice which includes the enforcement of religious laws. (hifz al-din) and safeguarding the ummah (hifz al-ummah).
References
References
Ahdiat, Adi. “32 Negara Terapkan Batas Usia Minimum Capres 35 Tahun, Ini Daftarnya.” Databoks, 2023. https://www.katadata.co.id.
Ahmad. “Ketentuan Batas Minimal Usia Kawin: Sejarah, Implikasi Penetapan Undang-Undang Perkawinan.” Petita: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum Dan Syariah 1, no. 1 (2016). https://doi.org/10.22373/petita.v1i1.77.
Al-Zuhaily, Wahbah. Ushul Al-Fiqh Al-Islami. Damaskus: Dar al-Fikr, 1986.
Dedi, Syahrial. “Perluasan Teori Maqashid Al-Syari’ah: Kaji Ulang Wacana Hifdz Al-‘Ummah A. Djuzuli.” Al-Istinbath: Jurnal Hukum Islam 1, no. 1 (2016): 45–62.
Haq, Hamka. Al-Syatibi: Aspek Teologis Konsep Mashlahah Dalam Kitab Al-Muwafaqat. Jakarta: Erlangga, 2007.
Ika Yunia Fauziah. Prinsip Dasar Ekonomi Islam Perspektif Maqashid Al-Syariah. Jakarta: Prenada Media Group, 2014.
Juhaya S. Praja. Filsafat Hukum Islam. Bandung: LPPM Universitas Islam Bandung, 1995.
Maharani, Adna Maurilla. “Mahkamah Konstitusi: Tinjauan Kewenangan Dan Fungsi Dalam Negara Hukum Demokratis Berdasarkan UUD 1945.” Souvereignty: Jurnal Demokrasi Dan Ketahanan Nasional 1, no. 4 (2022): 717–18.
Marzuki, Laica. “Judicial Review Di Mahkamah Konstitusi.” Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia 1, no. 3 (2004): 2.
Moh. Ali. “Judicial Review Satu Atap Di Mahkamah Konstitusi Sebagai Refleksi.” Jurnal Hukum 1, no. 2 (2021): 222–34.
Muhammad Said bin Ahmad bin Mas’ud al-Yubi. Maqashid Al-Syariah Al-Islamiyah Wa ‘Alaqatuha Bi Al-Adillah Al-Syar’Iyyah. Riyadh: Dar al-Hijrah, 1998.
Nanang Sri Darmadi, SH., MH. “KEDUDUKAN DAN WEWENANG MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI DALAM SISTEM HUKUM KETATANEGARAAN INDONESIA Oleh : Nanang Sri Darmadi, SH., MH Dosen Fakultas Hukum UNISSULA.” Kedudukan Dan Wewenang Mahkamah Konstitusi 2 (1970): 667–90. http://www.mahkamahkonstitusi.go.id/public/content/infoumum/ejurnal/pdf/ejurnal_vol 7 nmr 1 Februari 2010.pdf.
Satriawan, Iwan. “Kedudukan Dan Peran Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan Indonesia.” Jurnal Konstitusi 1, no. 2 (2008): 43.
Syahrizal, Ahmad. Peradilan Konstitusi, Suatu Studi Tentang Ajudikasi Konstitusional Sebagai Mekanisme Penyelesaian Sengketa Normatif. Jakarta: Pradnya Paramita, 2006.
Wardani, Ivana Eka Kusuma. “Peran Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Mengawal Prinsip Checks and Balances Terhadap Dewan Perwakilan Daerah Di Indonesia.” Volksgeist 2, no. 2 (2019): 239–52.
